Categories
Technology

GST Network Starts Providing Auto-Drafted ITC Statement GSTR-2B to Assist Taxpayers in Determining ITC Liability

The GST Network (GSTN) on Saturday started providing auto-drafted input tax credit (ITC) statement GSTR-2B to taxpayers. The newly launched initiative would assist the taxpayers in determining their ITC liability. GSTR-2B will be generated on GST portal for every registered person on the basis of the information furnished by his suppliers. It will be made available for each month, on the 12th day of the succeeding month, GSTN said in a statement. Moreover, it is expected that GSTR-2B will help in reduction in time taken for preparing return, minimising errors, assist reconciliation & simplify compliance relating to filing of returns.

The GST Network handles the IT backbone of Goods and Services Tax (GST). “It is expected that GSTR-2B will help in reduction in time taken for preparing return, minimising errors, assisting reconciliation and simplify compliance relating to filing of returns,” it said.

Key features in GSTR-2B which would assist taxpayers in return filing are as under:

  1. It contains information on import of goods from the ICEGATE system including inward supplies of goods received from Special Economic Zones Units / Developers. This is not available with the release of GSTR-2B for the month of July and will be made available shortly.
  2. A summary statement which shows all the ITC available and non-available under each section. The advisory given against each section clarifies the action to be taken by the taxpayers in their respective section of GSTR-3B;
  3. Document level details of all invoices, credit notes, debit notes etc. is also provided both for viewing and download.
  4. GSTR-2B for the month of July 2020 has been made available on the common portal on trial basis.

Since, this is the first time that the statement is being introduced, taxpayers are advised to refer to GSTR-2B for the month of July, 2020 only for feedback purposes. All taxpayers are requested to go through their GSTR-2B for July 2020 and after comparing the same with the credit availed by them in July 2020, provide feedback (if any) on any aspect of GSTR-2B by raising a ticket on the self-service portal (https://selfservice.gstsystem.in/). All taxpayers are advised to view the detailed advisory relating to GSTR-2B on the common portal before using the statement.

The GST Council, in its 39th meeting held on March 14, 2020, had recommended to adopt and implement the incremental approach of linking the present system of filing of GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 and other significant changes like enhancements in GSTR-2A and its linking to GSTR-3B. One such enhancement that the Council recommended was introduction of an auto-drafted input tax credit (ITC) statement which would aid in assisting / determining the input tax credit that is available for every taxpayer.

Categories
Finance

Delayed GST Payment: Govt Changes Interest Liability Rules, Interest to Be Charged on Net Tax Liability From September 1, 2020

New Delhi, August 26: The government on Wednesday changed the interest liability rules and said that the interest on delayed payment of Goods and Services Tax (GST) will be charged on net tax liability with effect from September 1. Reports inform that the industry had earlier this year raised concern over the directive of recovery of about Rs 46,000 crore of unpaid interest on delayed GST payment. The interest was charged on gross tax liability.

It was in March that the GST Council, which comprises of centre and state finance ministers, had decided in its 39th meeting that interest for delay in payment of GST to be charged on net tax liability with effect from July 1, 2017, and law would be amended retrospectively. However, on August 25, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) notified September 1, 2020, as the date from which interest would be charged on net tax liability.

Earlier, the CBIC had said that GST law permits interest calculation on delayed GST payment on the basis of gross tax liability. This position has been upheld in the Telangana High Court’s decision dated April 18, 2019. It must be noted that the net GST liability is arrived at after deducting input tax credit from gross GST liability. Therefore, calculating interest on gross GST liability increases the payout burden on businesses.

According to AMRG & Associates Senior Partner Rajat Mohan, this notification seems to be in disconnect with decisions of GST Council wherein it was assured to the taxpayers that the said benefit would be available retrospectively from July 1, 2017. “Prospective availability of this benefit would mean that millions of taxpayers may be looking at demand of interest for over 3 years from the date of GST implementation. Businesses are expected to approach the High Courts again on this unjustified and illegal demand of interest basis the ”principle of estoppel”, Mohan said.

Businesses, which are other than those under the composition scheme and quarterly return filers, registered under goods and services tax (GST) have to file returns (GSTR-1). They have to show tax liability by 11th of following month and pay taxes by filing GSTR-3B between 20-24 (due date varies according to the state in which businesses are registered). There have been cases where GST assessees have paid taxes after due date but did not pay the interest due on account of delayed payment.

Categories
Finance MSME Startup

Ministry of MSME Issues Circular Stating RBI’s Criteria for Classification of Enterprises Under MSMED Act, 2006, Here Are the Details

New Delhi, August 24: The Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium and Medium Enterprises on Monday issued the Reserve Bank of India’s notification for clarifications of small and medium and medium enterprises in the country. The re-classification of MSMEs have been done by the Union government under the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 and is effective from July 1, 2020.

Under the Gazette notification, released by the RBI and reissued by Ministry of MSMEs, several criteria have been mentioned which contains the definition of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises as per Section 7 (I) of the MSMED Act, 2006.

Definition of MSMEs under MSMED Act:

Micro Enterprise: A firm where the investment in plant and machinery or equipment does not exceed Rs 1 crore. Also, turnover does not exceed Rs 5 crore.

Small Enterprise: A firm where the investment in plant and machinery or equipment does not exceed Rs 10 crore. Also, turnover does not exceed Rs 50 crore.

Medium Enterprise: A firm where the investment in plant and machinery or equipment does not exceed Rs 50 crore. Also, turnover does not exceed Rs 250 crore.

Apart from this, the RBI notification mentioned composite criterion of investment and turnover for the classification of MSMEs. It says that if an enterprise crosses the ceiling limits specified for its present category in either of the two criteria of investment or turnover, it will cease to exist in that category.

The notification said that all the enterprises — whose Goods and Services Tax Identification Number (GSTIN) are listed against the
same Permanent Account Number (PAN) — will be collectively treated as one enterprise. Adding more, it said that the turnover and investment figures for all of those entities will be seen together and only the aggregate values will be considered for classification of MSMEs.

Calculation of Turnover:

For the calculation of investment in plant and machinery or equipment in an enterprise, RBI said that it will link Income Tax Return (ITR) of the previous years filed under the Income Tax Act, 1961. For new enterprises — whose ITR details are not available — the investment will be based on self-declaration of the promoter of the enterprise.

However, those relaxations will end after the March 31 of the financial year in which it files its first ITR. Also, purchase — invoice — the value of a plant and machinery or equipment will be taken into account excluding GST — on self-disclosure basis — if the enterprise is a new one without any ITR.

Among other details, RBI said that it will exclude exports of goods or services or both while calculating the turnover of any enterprise for MSMEs for classification. Adding more, RBI circular stated that information related with turnover and exports turnover for an enterprise will be linked to the Income Tax Act or the Central Goods and Services Act (CGST Act) and the GSTIN. For an enterprise, who don’t have PAN, their turnover will be considered on a self-declaration basis for a period up to March 31, 2021. Following this, PAN and GSTIN will be mandatory.

Categories
Technology

Aadhaar Authentication to Help Businesses Get GST Registration Within 3 Days

In what is believed to be a major boost for businesses in India, the businesses that provide Aadhaar number while applying for registration under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) will get the approval in three working days. Last week, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) had notified Aadhaar authentication for GST registration with effect from August 21, 2020. The notification also provides that in case businesses do not provide Aadhaar number, then GST registration would be granted only after physical verification of the place of business.

Sources believe that the Aadhaar authentication is expected to facilitate genuine and honest taxpayers while at the same time keeping fake and fraudulent entities away from GST.

Two important things to know:

  1. For a person opting for Aadhaar authentication for new GST registration would get it within just three working days, if no notice is issued and would not need to wait for physical verification.
  2. While applicants not opting for Aadhaar authentication for GST registration would be granted it only after physical verification of the place of business or documentary verification which may take up to 21 working days or more if notice is issued, sources said.

According to a report by PTI, sources of the Finance Ministry said the GST Council in its 39th meeting held on March 14, 2020, had approved operationalisation of Aadhaar authentication for new taxpayers. However, its implementation was postponed due to the lockdown on account of COVID-19 pandemic.

Sources further said that keeping the COVID-19 pandemic in view, it has been provided that the officer may, if the circumstances warrant, opt for asking for additional documents in lieu of the pre-registration for physical verification of the premises.

Categories
Finance Strategy

GST Council Likely to Meet on August 27 to Discuss Compensation Payout to States

New Delhi, August 19: The Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council is likely to meet on August 27 to discuss the compensation pay-out to states. The council will also discuss the opinion of the Attorney General on the legality of market borrowing to meet revenue shortfall. This will be the 41st meeting of the GST Council and will be held via video conference. Sources reveal that the meeting would be a single agenda meeting on states’ compensation.

A full-fledged meeting of the Council would be held on September 19, the agenda for which is to be decided, a report by news agency PTI said. The Attorney General, the chief legal officer of the government, is of the opinion that the Centre has no statutory obligation to make up for any shortfall in GST revenues of states from its coffers, sources revealed.

They had earlier indicated that following the AG’s opinion, states may now have to look at market borrowings to meet the revenue shortfall and the GST Council will take a final call. In March, the Centre had sought views from Attorney General KK Venugopal on the legality of market borrowing by the GST Council to make up for any shortfall in compensation fund – a corpus created from levy of additional tax on luxury and sin goods to compensate states for revenue shortfall arising from their taxes being subsumed into GST.

Reports inform that the Attorney General had also opined that the Council would have to decide on meeting the shortfall in the GST compensation fund by providing the sufficient amount to be credited to the fund. As per sources, the options before the Council for meeting the shortfall could be to rationalize GST rates, cover more items under the compensation cess or increase the compensation cess, or recommend higher borrowing by states to be repaid by the future collection into the compensation fund.

Under the GST law, states were guaranteed to be compensated bi-monthly for any loss of revenue in the first five years of the GST implementation from July 1, 2017. The shortfall is calculated assuming a 14 per cent annual growth in GST collections by states over the base year of 2015-16. Under the GST structure, taxes are levied under 5, 12, 18 and 28 per cent slabs. On top of the highest tax slab, a cess is levied on luxury, sin and demerit goods and the proceeds from the same are used to compensate states for any revenue loss.

The GST Council has to decide how to meet the shortfall in such circumstances and not the central government, sources added.  Any borrowing of the central government is upon the security of the Consolidated Fund of India. Similarly, borrowing by a state government is upon the security of the consolidated fund of the state.

In either case, it would lead to increased general government debt burden and also a higher fiscal deficit. The payment of GST compensation to states became an issue after revenues from the imposition of cess started dwindling since August 2019 and the Centre had to dive into the excess cess amount collected during 2017-18 and 2018-19.

In 2019-20, the Centre had released over Rs 1.65 lakh crore as GST compensation. However, the amount of cess collected during the year 2019-20 was Rs 95,444 crore. The compensation payout amount was Rs 69,275 crore in 2018-19 and Rs 41,146 crore in 2017-18.